D.N. had Derrick Rose, he peeled off three against a Boston Celtics team identical (if less healthy) to the one that just MMOgo madden mobile coins swept New York. So, is V.D.N. a better coach than D'Antoni after all? Are we all idiots for having ripped Reinsdorf back in 2008?It's not that simple, just as the D'Antoni hire in New York wasn't that simple, and the future of Mike D., Stan Van Gundy, Frank
Vogel, Rick Carlisle and all of the other unsettled coaches in the NBA Playoffs are not at all simple. We still struggle mightily to judge NBA coaches, with incredibly little agreement on even how much coaches impact performance, let alone any sort of measurement of that impact. With so little understanding of how coaching impacts results, how can we judge decisions that teams make on guys like D'Antoni or Van Gundy?The Atlanta
Hawks-Orlando Magic series is rife with stomach-churning doubt. Van Gundy is considered one of smartest basketball coaches on the planet, a lifer with an amazing system, passion beyond reproach and a white board straight out of A Beautiful Mind. All of the basic tenets of advanced basketball metrics seem to be built into his understanding of the game -- the copious three-pointers, the shunning of mid-range jumpers, the focus on shot defense instead of turnover creation.
Few coaches fit the title "basketball genius" as well as Stan Van Gundy. he's just getting his ass handed to him on a platter of doom by Larry Drew.Drew, a coach in his first season in the NBA's big chair. Drew, a coach who still thinks it's OK to sit his best player, Al Horford, for the entire first half because of two fouls. Drew, who took a flex offense Mike Woodson had ranked